Patch: Fixed patch for moving RSVD/SHVXD to vfs_default

[Michael Adam]

On 2015-09-18 at 06:44 +0200, Volker Lendecke wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 17, 2015 at 04:49:19PM -0700, Jeremy Allison wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 08:43:46AM +0200, Michael Adam wrote:
> > > 
> > > For me, it just does not feel right to let the virtual NTFS
> > > file system layer read and (especially) write parts of the
> > > SMB request and response packets directly.
> > 
> > If these packets are the equivalent of IOCTL's, then
> > to me it makes perfect sense - without introducing an
> > extra translation layer.
> 
> Well, I'm sure there's heated arguments about the beauty of
> the ioctl concept, but that's something for another day I
> guess. :-)

:-)

And we are not talking about ioctls but create calls,
or I didn't get the parallel.

Cheers - Michael
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-technical/attachments/20150918/2211dd3e/attachment.sig>