Do anyone here have the experience with 64bits compiled Samba on SPARC?
dam at opencsw.org
Mon Nov 30 20:18:39 UTC 2015
> On Thu, Nov 26, 2015 at 06:20:40AM +0100, Jiri Sasek - Solaris Prague wrote:
>> I have built 64bits Samba and winbindd is receiving the SIGBUS(*)
> The problem is that we don't have SPARC in any way easily
> accessible. If you look at CLANG warnings, there's hundreds
> of alignment problems we potentially have. Fixing all of
> them will be a big challenge, but finding the relevant ones
> would be much easier if we had access to such a box.
I can provide access to our Solaris buildfarm and already wrote to both
build at samba.org and Jeremy some time ago but didn’t get a reply.
This is my original message:
> Von: Dagobert Michelsen <dam at opencsw.org>
> Datum: 27. März 2015 um 10:53:35 MEZ
> An: build at samba.org
> Betreff: Solaris build servers at OpenCSW
> I would like to offer some build machines for the Samba CI at
> At the moment I am making the first run of build_test on the following machines:
> unstable10s Solaris 10 Sparc
> unstable10x Solaris 10 x86
> unstable11s Solaris 11 Sparc
> unstable11x Solaris 11 x86
> „unstable“ refers to our own OpenCSW „unstable“ catalog which gets the latest packages.
> All machines have our own OpenCSW packages of GCC 4.9.2 and a new ccache 3.2.1
> in addition to the Sun/Oracle Studio compilers 12/12.1/12.2/12.3/12.4 located in
> I’d be happy if you could provide me with matching passwords.
I have also set up continuous builds on our OpenCSW environment which builds
on every commit:
Just let me know if you want an account or a different setup of the CI or
automatic notifications on breakages.
"You don't become great by trying to be great, you become great by wanting to do something,
and then doing it so hard that you become great in the process." - xkcd #896
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 203 bytes
Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
More information about the samba-technical