Questions about smbd option "strict rename"
jra at samba.org
Fri Nov 27 23:35:36 UTC 2015
On Fri, Nov 27, 2015 at 06:52:59PM +0100, Ralph Boehme wrote:
> patch attached. What do you think?
Yeah, that looks much closer !
> I'm not fully happy with the flag names yet, I think we should prefix
> them with VFS_ so they won't collide with flags we may add later on
> for SMB2/3 UNIX extensions.
Hmmm. Don't like VFS_ as they're not really VFS. How about
FSP_ prefix as they're more to do with fsp open handles ?
More information about the samba-technical