Questions about smbd option "strict rename"

[Jeremy Allison]

On Fri, Nov 27, 2015 at 06:52:59PM +0100, Ralph Boehme wrote:
> patch attached. What do you think?

Yeah, that looks much closer !

> I'm not fully happy with the flag names yet, I think we should prefix
> them with VFS_ so they won't collide with flags we may add later on
> for SMB2/3 UNIX extensions.

Hmmm. Don't like VFS_ as they're not really VFS. How about
FSP_ prefix as they're more to do with fsp open handles ?