ldb bug fixes

[Volker Lendecke]

On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 02:35:38PM +1300, Adrian Cochrane wrote:
> It turns out that wouldn't be an easier fix because
> /lib/talloc/talloc_guide.txt specifically states:
> >  talloc_realloc(context, ptr, type, 0) ==> talloc_free(ptr);
> 
> However I did take your advice and incorporated it into this updated
> patch.

Ok, I was confused by talloc_array vs talloc_realloc.

Question: Where in the code is msg->elements being NULL a
problem? If msg->num_elements==0, why does someone look at
msg->elements?

Thanks, Volker

-- 
SerNet GmbH, Bahnhofsallee 1b, 37081 Göttingen
phone: +49-551-370000-0, fax: +49-551-370000-9
AG Göttingen, HRB 2816, GF: Dr. Johannes Loxen
http://www.sernet.de, mailto:kontakt at sernet.de