CTDB with GlusterFS.

Ralph Boehme rb at sernet.de
Fri Nov 13 09:28:05 UTC 2015


On Thu, Nov 12, 2015 at 01:51:40PM +1100, Martin Schwenke wrote:
> On Wed, 11 Nov 2015 07:26:03 +0100, Ralph Boehme <rb at sernet.de> wrote:
> 
> > On Wed, Nov 11, 2015 at 05:12:31PM +1100, Martin Schwenke wrote:
> > > This would allow you to test the fcntl(2) locking without having all of
> > > CTDB in the way.
> > > 
> > > If you're not a C programmer (though I think this could probably be
> > > done with Python too) then please yell and I'll whip something up for
> > > you to test with...  :-)  
> > 
> > fwiw, I have this WIP patch for ping_pong in a working branch.
> 
> I think we discussed this some time ago and some of us thought there
> were better ways.  I think one reply was probably that it didn't
> belong in ping_pong.   Also, Michael pointed out another way using
> existing ping_pong functionality.
> 
> However, I think your patch creates a very obvious way of testing
> byte-range locks and we should think about how it can be cleaned
> up and pushed.
> 
> You probably need to clean up the repetitive usage checking...  :-)

I'll cleanup and resubmit later on today.

-Ralph

-- 
SerNet GmbH, Bahnhofsallee 1b, 37081 Göttingen
phone: +49-551-370000-0, fax: +49-551-370000-9
AG Göttingen, HRB 2816, GF: Dr. Johannes Loxen
http://www.sernet.de,mailto:kontakt@sernet.de



More information about the samba-technical mailing list