[PATCH v3 2/5] waf: improve readability of cross-answers generated by cross-execute
Uri Simchoni
urisimchoni at gmail.com
Tue May 5 16:02:16 MDT 2015
When generating a result for cross-answers from the (retcode, retstring) tuple:
- (0, "output") indicated as "output"
- 1 is interpreted as generic fail code, instead of 255, because most
if not all tests fail with 1 as exit code rather than 255
- For failing test, use NO instead of FAIL, because that's not
necessarily a failure (it could mean that something is NOT
broken)
Signed-off-by: Uri Simchoni <urisimchoni at gmail.com>
---
buildtools/wafsamba/samba_cross.py | 13 ++++++++-----
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/buildtools/wafsamba/samba_cross.py b/buildtools/wafsamba/samba_cross.py
index 9ca2f8d..8213e17 100644
--- a/buildtools/wafsamba/samba_cross.py
+++ b/buildtools/wafsamba/samba_cross.py
@@ -6,7 +6,7 @@ from Configure import conf
real_Popen = None
ANSWER_UNKNOWN = (254, "")
-ANSWER_FAIL = (255, "")
+ANSWER_NO = (1, "")
ANSWER_OK = (0, "")
cross_answers_incomplete = False
@@ -33,10 +33,13 @@ def add_answer(ca_file, msg, answer):
f.write('%s: OK\n' % msg)
elif answer == ANSWER_UNKNOWN:
f.write('%s: UNKNOWN\n' % msg)
- elif answer == ANSWER_FAIL:
- f.write('%s: FAIL\n' % msg)
+ elif answer == ANSWER_NO:
+ f.write('%s: NO\n' % msg)
else:
- f.write('%s: (%d, "%s")\n' % (msg, retcode, retstring))
+ if retcode == 0:
+ f.write('%s: "%s"\n' % (msg, retstring))
+ else:
+ f.write('%s: (%d, "%s")\n' % (msg, retcode, retstring))
f.close()
@@ -64,7 +67,7 @@ def cross_answer(ca_file, msg):
return ANSWER_UNKNOWN
elif ans == "FAIL" or ans == "NO":
f.close()
- return ANSWER_FAIL
+ return ANSWER_NO
elif ans[0] == '"':
f.close()
return (0, ans.strip('"'))
--
1.9.1
More information about the samba-technical
mailing list