syntax error in source3/locking/brlock.c

[Thomas Schulz]

> On Mon, Mar 09, 2015 at 01:12:48PM -0400, Thomas Schulz wrote:
> > It looks like we are only going the fix the one file with the fatal error,
> > but I just tried the smaller patch. It applied cleanly and the result
> > builds correctly. I do wonder about lines such as:
> > 
> > +       struct torture_lease_break break_info_tmp = { { { { { 0 } } } } };
> > 
> > I am affraid that we are in danger of using up the world's supply of
> > braces. :-)
> 
> Is Solaris happy with just {0}?
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Volker

I just tried it and just { 0 } makes the Solaris compiler happy.
I am not a good enough C programmer to understand why more than one set
of braces might be needed, I just thought that those lines looked odd.

I also just noticed that the small patch misses one instance in
source4/torture/smb2/util.c. The large patch had both of them.

Tom Schulz
Applied Dynamics Intl.
schulz at adi.com