[Patches] avoid segfault in durable-open test

[Douglas Bagnall]

hi Michael,

Amended patches attached.

On 19/06/15 22:10, Michael Adam wrote:
> 1. in the first patch, can you do if (tree1 != NULL) instead of
>    if (tree1) ?

I've taken the liberty of adding your "reviewed by" on this one

> 2. For the second patch: we try to get rid of these locally
>    defined CHECK_FOO macros.
>    There are macros in lib/torture/torture.h of the form
> 
>    torture_assert
>    torture_assert_foobar
>    torture_assert_foobar_goto
> 
>    I sugget using torture_assert_ntstatus_equal_goto().
> 
>    This is more writing than CHECK...(), but it is the
>    standard way. Could you do that instead?

...but not this one.

cheers,
Douglas

> Thanks - Michael
> 
> On 2015-06-19 at 16:18 +1200, Douglas Bagnall wrote:
>> hi all,
>>
>> After my last patches, an autobuild on sn-devel segfaulted in the
>> samba3.smb2.durable-open.open2-lease(nt4_dc) test. The first of these
>> patches turns the segfault into a normal failure (or at least it would
>> if we could reproduce it). The second should make the branching in these
>> tests a little bit clearer for the next novice to wander this way.
>>
>> I touched that file but I can't see how its related to the error.
>>
>> Douglas

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: durable-open.patch
Type: text/x-diff
Size: 35489 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-technical/attachments/20150625/60822334/attachment.patch>