Locating regressions for 4.3
Andrew Bartlett
abartlet at samba.org
Wed Jul 22 08:26:46 UTC 2015
On Wed, 2015-07-22 at 10:19 +0200, Stefan (metze) Metzmacher wrote:
> Am 22.07.2015 um 00:44 schrieb Andrew Bartlett:
> > Wed, 2015-07-22 at 00:15 +0200, Stefan (metze) Metzmacher wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>> I have opened a new bug for regressions at
> >>> https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11406 but I would rather
> >>> we
> >>> just tagged bugs as regressions in the importance.
> >>>
> >>> Regardless, we need to use searches, not blocker bugs, as the way
> >>> to
> >>> deal with the actually blocking list, and we need to start from
> >>> zero,
> >>> not the pushed-forward list. For example, while there are many,
> >>> legitimate and important issues, I've not yet seen an AD DC bug in
> >>> that
> >>> list that is an actual regression.
> >>
> >> I'm not sure we need
> >>
> >> https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10695
> >> https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11405
> >> https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11406
> >>
> >> anymore, we could use milestones...
> >
> > Agreed, I would prefer we just used the severity of regression (and
> > perhaps critical) and the milestone of 4.3 to decide what a blocker is,
> > and then close all of the above.
> >
> > We should also close https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11376 a
> > s it really serves the same purpose. That should be able to be
> > determined by the component and perhaps a flag.
>
> But components and flags doesn't match what I'm looking for.
>
> I want all bugs which are in any way relevant for an ad dc.
OK.
> I could use private tags on the bugs and filter on them, if others
> don't care...
I don't mind, particularly if you want to maintain the list.
Andrew Bartlett
--
Andrew Bartlett http://samba.org/~abartlet/
Authentication Developer, Samba Team http://samba.org
Samba Developer, Catalyst IT http://catalyst.net.nz/services/samba
More information about the samba-technical
mailing list