[PATCH] notifyd: fix memory alignment
Volker Lendecke
Volker.Lendecke at SerNet.DE
Sat Jul 18 19:52:28 UTC 2015
On Fri, Jul 17, 2015 at 11:12:46AM -0700, Jeremy Allison wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 16, 2015 at 09:47:53PM +0300, Uri Simchoni wrote:
> > Best thing is to set up the DB fetching in a way that the data is
> > aligned when fetched (the parse function can verify this). I'll look
> > into it but xtdb experts can look into it without the learning curve.
> > Second best option is to have an array that grows as-needed. This
> > removes the allocations but not the copying.
>
> Yeah, we can't avoid the memcpy I think (if you can
> think of a way I'm very interested).
What about the attached patch? Survives an initial small
test for me.
Volker
--
SerNet GmbH, Bahnhofsallee 1b, 37081 Göttingen
phone: +49-551-370000-0, fax: +49-551-370000-9
AG Göttingen, HRB 2816, GF: Dr. Johannes Loxen
http://www.sernet.de, mailto:kontakt at sernet.de
-------------- next part --------------
From 1abb03c6a93eb120442e3f4fbda35875db8c36bd Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Volker Lendecke <vl at samba.org>
Date: Sat, 18 Jul 2015 21:50:55 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] dbwrap_rbt: Make "key" and "value" aligned to 16 byte
---
lib/dbwrap/dbwrap_rbt.c | 51 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
1 file changed, 39 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
diff --git a/lib/dbwrap/dbwrap_rbt.c b/lib/dbwrap/dbwrap_rbt.c
index 3f97086..03f2f57 100644
--- a/lib/dbwrap/dbwrap_rbt.c
+++ b/lib/dbwrap/dbwrap_rbt.c
@@ -38,13 +38,6 @@ struct db_rbt_rec {
struct db_rbt_node {
struct rb_node rb_node;
size_t keysize, valuesize;
-
- /*
- * key and value are appended implicitly, "data" is only here as a
- * target for offsetof()
- */
-
- char data[1];
};
/*
@@ -83,12 +76,43 @@ static int db_rbt_compare(TDB_DATA a, TDB_DATA b)
static void db_rbt_parse_node(struct db_rbt_node *node,
TDB_DATA *key, TDB_DATA *value)
{
- key->dptr = ((uint8_t *)node) + offsetof(struct db_rbt_node, data);
+ size_t key_offset, value_offset;
+
+ key_offset = DBWRAP_RBT_ALIGN(sizeof(struct db_rbt_node));
+ key->dptr = ((uint8_t *)node) + key_offset;
key->dsize = node->keysize;
- value->dptr = key->dptr + node->keysize;
+
+ value_offset = DBWRAP_RBT_ALIGN(node->keysize);
+ value->dptr = key->dptr + value_offset;
value->dsize = node->valuesize;
}
+static ssize_t db_rbt_reclen(size_t keylen, size_t valuelen)
+{
+ size_t len, tmp;
+
+ len = DBWRAP_RBT_ALIGN(sizeof(struct db_rbt_node));
+
+ tmp = DBWRAP_RBT_ALIGN(keylen);
+ if (tmp < keylen) {
+ goto overflow;
+ }
+
+ len += tmp;
+ if (len < tmp) {
+ goto overflow;
+ }
+
+ len += valuelen;
+ if (len < valuelen) {
+ goto overflow;
+ }
+
+ return len;
+overflow:
+ return -1;
+}
+
static NTSTATUS db_rbt_store(struct db_record *rec, TDB_DATA data, int flag)
{
struct db_rbt_ctx *db_ctx = talloc_get_type_abort(
@@ -99,6 +123,7 @@ static NTSTATUS db_rbt_store(struct db_record *rec, TDB_DATA data, int flag)
struct rb_node ** p;
struct rb_node * parent;
+ ssize_t reclen;
TDB_DATA this_key, this_val;
if (rec_priv->node != NULL) {
@@ -123,10 +148,12 @@ static NTSTATUS db_rbt_store(struct db_record *rec, TDB_DATA data, int flag)
}
}
- node = (struct db_rbt_node *)talloc_size(db_ctx,
- offsetof(struct db_rbt_node, data) + rec->key.dsize
- + data.dsize);
+ reclen = db_rbt_reclen(rec->key.dsize, data.dsize);
+ if (reclen == -1) {
+ return NT_STATUS_INSUFFICIENT_RESOURCES;
+ }
+ node = talloc_size(db_ctx, reclen);
if (node == NULL) {
return NT_STATUS_NO_MEMORY;
}
--
1.7.9.5
More information about the samba-technical
mailing list