Spelling fixes for 'exlusive' and 'semantincs'

Volker Lendecke Volker.Lendecke at SerNet.DE
Fri Jul 3 09:27:05 CEST 2015


Hi!

Can you please add Signed-off-by: Lines? Apart from that,

Reviewed-by: Volker Lendecke <vl at samba.org>

Thanks!

Volker

On Wed, Jun 17, 2015 at 06:12:47PM +1000, Paul Wayper wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> I've got two trivial spelling fixes for review attached.  Let me know if
> that's the right format for them or if you'd prefer them in some other
> way :-)
> 
> Hope this helps,
> 
> Paul

> >From 48833856fd6bce976a009e1f6e8218e4fa7b572e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Paul Wayper <paulway at redhat.com>
> Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2015 12:10:00 +1000
> Subject: [PATCH 1/2] Spelling correction: exlusive -> exclusive
> 
> ---
>  source3/smbd/oplock.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/source3/smbd/oplock.c b/source3/smbd/oplock.c
> index 2d426f7..4d84347 100644
> --- a/source3/smbd/oplock.c
> +++ b/source3/smbd/oplock.c
> @@ -1211,7 +1211,7 @@ static void do_break_to_none(struct tevent_context *ctx,
>  		/* Paranoia .... */
>  		if (EXCLUSIVE_OPLOCK_TYPE(e->op_type)) {
>  			DEBUG(0,("%s: PANIC. "
> -				 "share mode entry %d is an exlusive "
> +				 "share mode entry %d is an exclusive "
>  				 "oplock !\n", __func__, i ));
>  			TALLOC_FREE(lck);
>  			abort();
> -- 
> 1.8.3.1
> 

> >From 26ba792f7b59961f7173b83e1833561ac719e2f1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Paul Wayper <paulway at redhat.com>
> Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2015 12:11:03 +1000
> Subject: [PATCH 2/2] Spelling correction: exlusive -> exclusive and semantincs
>  -> semantics
> 
> ---
>  ctdb/doc/readonlyrecords.txt | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/ctdb/doc/readonlyrecords.txt b/ctdb/doc/readonlyrecords.txt
> index d108ffd..5374a85 100644
> --- a/ctdb/doc/readonlyrecords.txt
> +++ b/ctdb/doc/readonlyrecords.txt
> @@ -12,7 +12,7 @@ rapidly bounce between nodes and acts as a scalability limitation.
>  This primarily affects locking.tdb and brlock.tdb, two databases where record access is 
>  read-mostly and where writes are semi-rare.
>  
> -For the common case, if CTDB provided shared non-exlusive Read-Only lock semantincs
> +For the common case, if CTDB provided shared non-exclusive Read-Only lock semantics
>  this would greatly improve scaling for these workloads.
>  
>  
> -- 
> 1.8.3.1
> 


-- 
SerNet GmbH, Bahnhofsallee 1b, 37081 Göttingen
phone: +49-551-370000-0, fax: +49-551-370000-9
AG Göttingen, HRB 2816, GF: Dr. Johannes Loxen
http://www.sernet.de, mailto:kontakt at sernet.de


More information about the samba-technical mailing list