[PATCHES] lib/util - cleanups, build restructuring, charset compatibility

Lukas Slebodnik lslebodn at redhat.com
Tue Jan 6 07:24:16 MST 2015

On (03/10/14 16:39), Martin Schwenke wrote:
>On Fri, 26 Sep 2014 15:45:05 +1000, Martin Schwenke <martin at meltin.net>
>> On Wed, 24 Sep 2014 04:54:46 +1000, Martin Schwenke <martin at meltin.net>
>> wrote:
>> > So, in this case, could we just drop the include of fault.h, remove
>> > the SMB_ASSERT() and call abort() directly after logging a useful
>> > message, like in the attached patch? I've also included the 2 patches
>> > that would conflict as a result.  The alternative branch in my tree is
>> > samba-build-alt.
>> I've looked at various alternatives and decided that this is the best
>> option.  I've re-pushed my samba-build branch with this improvement.
>Reposting latest patchset.  I've rebased my samba-build branch and
>pushed it again...
>I'm a little backed up behind this patchset (and the next one which
>will allow CTDB to use modern samba-util and samba-debug).  :-(
>Thanks for any feedback...  :-)
Could you take a look into https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11033?

I might be wrong, but I suspect problem is caused by these patches.


More information about the samba-technical mailing list