Patch: Implement FSCTL_LMR_REQUEST_RESILIENCY
allspace at gmail.com
Sat Feb 28 19:29:26 MST 2015
Is there any new progress on this? I believe there are too many people are
waiting for this feature.
On Thu, Oct 09, 2014 at 02:45:04PM -0700, Richard Sharpe wrote:
>* On Wed, Oct 8, 2014 at 7:29 AM, Richard Sharpe
*>* <realrichardsharpe at gmail.com
*>* > Hi folks,
*>* > There are indications that HyperV requires the server to implement
*>* > FSCTL_LMR_REQUEST_RESILIENCY, so I have a proposed implementation of
*>* > it.
*>* > Attached is a patch for both FSCTL_LMR_REQUEST_RESILIENCY and a small
*>* > torture test for it (doesn't do much as yet.)
*>* > Eventually, we will also have to deal with the GUID-tagged blob that
*>* > is an Extra Info (Extra Create Parameter) that was in the CREATE
*>* > request that precedes the FSCTL as well, I imagine.
*> >* While we are arguing about all the abstruse technical details, the
*>* people I did this work for have reported that this change, along with
*>* one other thing, seems to be enough to have HyperV create a Virtual
*>* Disk on a Samba server, start the VM and install Windows.
That's *perfect* ! There are a lot of people who
have been waiting for this, so I'm really happy
you helped get this working !
Of course the "abstruse technical details" are the
bits that are going to make Samba -> Samba HyperV
live migration work, but it's still a great step
>* I hope to be able to write up the steps involved soon.
Yeah, please get this into a wiki. There are many
OEMs who will want to start playing with this
More information about the samba-technical