SMB3 encryption performance
Volker.Lendecke at SerNet.DE
Tue Feb 17 08:36:32 MST 2015
On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 04:22:29PM +0100, Volker Lendecke wrote:
> > If you prefer something which is LGPL, then use nettle . GnuTLS switched
> > from libgcrypt to libnettle ...
> > libcrypt from OpenSSL is another options. libressl is not in any distribution
> > right now.
> > -- andreas
> >  http://www.lysator.liu.se/~nisse/nettle/
> This is a minefield. Do we really want to participate? These fights
> tell me that consensus over a crypto library in the Free Software
> world is lightyears away. That would be a good reason to go and do it
> on our own.
Sorry for the spam, but the deeper you dig the worse it
has the lines
> GNU Nettle 3.0 is a major update to the library that breaks
> ABI compatibility with earlier versions of Nettle but is
> "mostly" source-level API compatible. Besides fixing a
> number of bugs and reworking some library interfaces, new
> features to Nettle 3.0 include:
Another Python2/3 situation? I can literally see the #ifdef
hell around security-sensitive code. No, thanks.
SerNet GmbH, Bahnhofsallee 1b, 37081 Göttingen
phone: +49-551-370000-0, fax: +49-551-370000-9
AG Göttingen, HRB 2816, GF: Dr. Johannes Loxen
http://www.sernet.de, mailto:kontakt at sernet.de
More information about the samba-technical