[RFC] Patchsets in a single mail? [Re: [PATCH 01/55] Add simple subunit runner outputting subunit v1.]

[Michael Adam]

On 2015-02-14 at 04:18 -0800, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 14, 2015 at 10:56:21AM +0100, Volker Lendecke wrote:
> > On Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 06:00:47PM -0500, Simo wrote:
> > > Because they have mail clients that make it easy to deal with them :-)
> > 
> > Do you have special tricks for mutt? Or do we have to switch
> > MUAs?
> 
> What's your problem with mutt and threaded patch sets?  I deal with them
> on various mailing lists all day long and I can't even think of a
> problem.

At least for me, the major pain point is not MUA handling
(this is just a nuisance) but the lack of overview on
the list. It is just so much more difficult to keep
track of what the current patchset ist when some amount
of discussion has happened.

Cheers - Michael
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-technical/attachments/20150214/8c123a9f/attachment.pgp>