Do anyone here have the experience with 64bits compiled Samba on SPARC?

[Jiri Sasek - Solaris Prague]

On 11/30/15 19:28, Ralph Boehme wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 09:26:34AM -0800, Jeremy Allison wrote:
>> On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 06:12:07PM +0100, Ralph Boehme wrote:
>>> On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 09:00:08AM -0800, Jeremy Allison wrote:
>>>> On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 04:52:03PM +0100, Jiri Sasek - Solaris Prague wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> On 11/30/15 16:08, Volker Lendecke wrote:
>>>>>> On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 03:40:10PM +0100, Jiri Sasek - Solaris Prague wrote:
>>>>>>> Could it be possible to commit your patch but slightly modified to
>>>>>>> do not chase memcpy() on platforms which do not throw SIGBUS on
>>>>>>> unaligned pointer into Samba upstream?
>>>>>> Why is that so bad?
>>>>> ...maybe I have a dinosaur-thinking yet  ...but it seems to me a bit
>>>>> costly to chase memcpy() on it  ...but I will leave it on Ralph's
>>>>> opinion.
>>>>> Many thanks to both of you,
>>>>  From the maestro himself (Donald Knuth).
>>>>
>>>> "The real problem is that programmers have spent far too much time
>>>> worrying about efficiency in the wrong places and at the wrong times;
>>>> premature optimization is the root of all evil (or at least most of
>>>> it) in programming."
>>> so I can push with a reviewed-by Donald? ;)
>> Nah, nothing so grand I'm afraid. Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra at samba.org>
> pushed, thanks!
>
> -Ralph
>

Many thanks to all  ...Jiri