Why does RedHat require that iniparser-devel be installed to build their 4.1.1 RPM when the source is in the tree?

[Michael Adam]

Hi Richard,

On 2014-10-30 at 12:17 -0700, Richard Sharpe wrote:
> 
> Does anyone have a clue why they have iniparser-devel as a
> BuildRequire when the code is in the source tree they import?

Well, the included iniparser copy is only there as a band aid
for systems that don't support it. And the redhat rpm knows that
the red hat system can provide iniparser-devel, so it is only
fair to require it, right?

The SerNet RPMs do the same, btw.

Cheers - Michael
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-technical/attachments/20141030/20cc4c90/attachment.pgp>