Status of SMB3?

Ben Greear greearb at
Mon Oct 20 11:38:03 MDT 2014

On 10/20/2014 10:35 AM, Steve French wrote:
> I should have mentioned that the mfsymlinks and apple style remap
> changes are in 3.18-rc1 not in 3.17

Thanks for the detailed update.

We'll add support for it in our testing tool (which is primarily used to
generate lots and lots of client cifs mounts to some DUT) and see how
that goes!


> On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 12:33 PM, Steve French <smfrench at> wrote:
>> This is a great question to explore now that significant SMB3
>> improvements have gone into 3.17.
>> SMB3 stability is much improved recently, in part due to the focus on
>> automated xfstesting over the past
>> months.   In addition, it is much more posix compatible now.
>> High level view:
>> - SMB3 generally stable
>> - SMB3 security is better than most alternatives (although finishing
>> up krb5 support would help, and SMB3.1 looks like it will be better
>> still when it is announced)
>> - SMB3 (thanks to Pavel's improvements this summer) is faster for
>> large file read/write than most alternatives.
>> - SMB3 is getting better at full posix compliance/emulation but not as
>> posix compliant as cifs dialect (with Unix extensions in the protocol)
>> was to Samba, but about as compliant as cifs was to Windows.
>>       - SMB3 can now do emulated symlinks (mfsymlinks) similar to
>> Apple (the "Minshall-French" style symlinks)
>>       - SMB3 now remaps the 7 reserved POSIX characters by default
>> (similar to Windows "SFM" and Apple, no need to do "mapchars" unless
>> you have legacy filenames created with this mount option which has :
>> or ? or < > )
>>       - SMB3 can do emulated fifo and device files (with "sfu" mount option)
>> - SMB3 can not retrieve posix mode bits from the ACL (yet) so would
>> love help finishing this off, Shirish was looking at it too) ala the
>> "cifsacl" mount option (which only works on cifs mounts)
>> - SMB3 can not do extended attributes (yet)
>> Known problems:
>> xfstests has about 10 failures (not counting a few server bugs we
>> found) shown when run with SMB3 mounts:
>> - 3 due to the wrong return code returned on rename of directory tree
>> onto an existing directory tree (was looking at adding an
>> "smb3_rename_pending_delete" helper function as cifs has to see if
>> that would help any of those)
>> - 2 or 3 relating to minor fix needed to fallocate support (to clear
>> local copy of pages on zero page fallocate)
>> - 2 due to timestamp caching
>> - 2 due to lack of posix mode emulation (posix permissions not
>> available until cifsacl mount option finished)
>> Performance:
>> - better than alternatives for large file i/o
>> - SMB2.1 and SMB3 leases are better than cifs oplocks which helps in
>> some long running i/o cases due to the improved caching
>> - chattier and slower than cifs for stat and readdir (SMB3 does
>> open/query/close instead of cifs's querypathinfo - 3 operations
>> instead of one).  This could be improved with better operation
>> compounding and some additional deferred close features.
>> - The copy offload and even the set compression (chflags/chattr +C)
>> can help - but the copy offload ioctl needs a little userspace copy
>> util to call it (for fast server side copy offload when source and
>> target are on the same server) as cifs.ko doesn't use the btrfs
>> refcopy ioctl number for copy offload.
>> - slower than cifs for most metadata heavy workloads - but could be
>> improved to be much better than cifs (implementing SMB3 directory
>> leases would be helpful)
>> - finishing SMB3 multichannel (and RDMA) would be a big help for
>> certain network constrained workloads
>> - SMB3 packet signing should be pretty fast compared to alternatives
>> SMB3 Unique Features
>> --------------------------------
>> Encrypted shares (would be useful to add and shouldn't be too hard)
>> Durable handles (implemented), Persistent Handles (not implemented yet)
>> Improved failover and Witness protocol would be very useful to add
>> Overall - SMB3 could become the optimal file transfer mechanism for
>> many more workloads with a few key improvements, but currently (3.17)
>> is quite good for large i/o and reasonably stable, and more secure for
>> some common use cases.
>> On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 11:44 AM, Ben Greear <greearb at> wrote:
>>> I notice at least some support for SMB3 in the 3.17 kernel.
>>> Any idea how complete SMB3 support is?
>>> Thanks,
>>> Ben
>>> --
>>> Ben Greear <greearb at>
>>> Candela Technologies Inc
>>> --
>>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-cifs" in
>>> the body of a message to majordomo at
>>> More majordomo info at
>> --
>> Thanks,
>> Steve

Ben Greear <greearb at>
Candela Technologies Inc

More information about the samba-technical mailing list