[PATCH 06/11] s3/libsmb_xattr: use security_ace_equal instead of sec_ace_equal

[David Disseldorp]

Both offer the same functionality, sec_ace_equal() will be removed.

Signed-off-by: David Disseldorp <ddiss at samba.org>
---
 source3/libsmb/libsmb_xattr.c | 9 +++++----
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/source3/libsmb/libsmb_xattr.c b/source3/libsmb/libsmb_xattr.c
index 8e6590a..8493776 100644
--- a/source3/libsmb/libsmb_xattr.c
+++ b/source3/libsmb/libsmb_xattr.c
@@ -64,7 +64,7 @@ ace_compare(struct security_ace *ace1,
         bool b2;
 
         /* If the ACEs are equal, we have nothing more to do. */
-        if (sec_ace_equal(ace1, ace2)) {
+        if (security_ace_equal(ace1, ace2)) {
 		return 0;
         }
 
@@ -152,7 +152,8 @@ sort_acl(struct security_acl *the_acl)
 	TYPESAFE_QSORT(the_acl->aces, the_acl->num_aces, ace_compare);
 
 	for (i=1;i<the_acl->num_aces;) {
-		if (sec_ace_equal(&the_acl->aces[i-1], &the_acl->aces[i])) {
+		if (security_ace_equal(&the_acl->aces[i-1],
+				       &the_acl->aces[i])) {
 			int j;
 			for (j=i; j<the_acl->num_aces-1; j++) {
 				the_acl->aces[j] = the_acl->aces[j+1];
@@ -1592,8 +1593,8 @@ cacl_set(SMBCCTX *context,
 			bool found = False;
 
 			for (j=0;old->dacl && j<old->dacl->num_aces;j++) {
-                                if (sec_ace_equal(&sd->dacl->aces[i],
-                                                  &old->dacl->aces[j])) {
+                                if (security_ace_equal(&sd->dacl->aces[i],
+						       &old->dacl->aces[j])) {
 					uint32 k;
 					for (k=j; k<old->dacl->num_aces-1;k++) {
 						old->dacl->aces[k] =
-- 
1.8.4.5