[PATCH] Remove cached event context from irpc and imessaging

[Stefan (metze) Metzmacher]

Am 07.05.2014 05:37, schrieb Andrew Bartlett:
> On Tue, 2014-05-06 at 13:13 +1200, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
>> On Tue, 2014-05-06 at 01:14 +0200, Stefan (metze) Metzmacher wrote:
>>> Am 06.05.2014 01:05, schrieb Andrew Bartlett:
>>>> On Mon, 2014-05-05 at 09:49 +0200, Stefan (metze) Metzmacher wrote:
>>>>> Am 05.05.2014 07:16, schrieb Andrew Bartlett:
>>>>>> The only part of this code with a stored event context is now the
>>>>>> binding_handle created by irpc_binding_handle() in the client, and
>>>>>> only if specified (otherwise a new nested event context is created).
>>>>>
>>>>> As far as I can see the "only if specified" case is not done in the commit
>>>>> and dcerpc_binding_handle_set_sync_ev() is still always called.
>>>>
>>>> It already did that internally (if you pass in NULL). 
>>>
>>> But we never pass NULL, so I think it's confusing in this commit message.
>>>
>>>>> What about moving dcerpc_binding_handle_set_sync_ev() into the callers?
>>>>
>>>> A very reasonable suggestion for a follow-up patch.  I'll see what I can
>>>> do.
>>>
>>> Thanks! I guess squashing this would make the patch simpler
>>> as we don't have to add the 'tevent_context' argument and then remove it
>>> again.
>>
>> I agree.  See attached, please review/push.  (I'm glad I prepared it in
>> two steps however, as it meant the compiler found all the calls I had to
>> add this after).
> 
> This set of patches fixes an issue with the change in service_task.c,
> and implements the TODO you requested in your tree, that we remove the
> sync handler from the async users.   
> 
> I do this in two steps so we can bisect any future issue, but you can
> squash them if you prefer.
> 
> Can you look over this carefully, and review/push if you are OK?

I've split them a bit and added some comments.

There's not real diff compared to yours in the end.

Both doesn't pass autobuild for me, even if I remove the top commit in both
versions...

metze
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: tmp.diff
Type: text/x-diff
Size: 16311 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-technical/attachments/20140507/fd74f9a0/attachment.diff>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 263 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-technical/attachments/20140507/fd74f9a0/attachment.pgp>