Why is SMB2 still disabled in our client by default?
smfrench at gmail.com
Sat Mar 29 22:06:27 MDT 2014
On Mar 28, 2014 5:45 PM, "Jeremy Allison" <jra at samba.org> wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 29, 2014 at 09:46:29AM +1300, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
> > The lack of UNIX extensions is going to be a tricky thing here, and is
> > going to either hinder the adoption of SMB2/3 or the unix extensions.
> > In the meantime, it would be good if we had a way to negotiate SMB2/3
> > for the RPC client use case, without the other impacts of raising the
> > global 'client max protocol'.
> I'll ping Steve to see if he's ready to start
> the SMB2 UNIX standardization work !
> Steve - ping ! Ready to go ?
More information about the samba-technical