Why is SMB2 still disabled in our client by default?

[Jeremy Allison]

On Sat, Mar 29, 2014 at 09:46:29AM +1300, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
> 
> The lack of UNIX extensions is going to be a tricky thing here, and is
> going to either hinder the adoption of SMB2/3 or the unix extensions.
> In the meantime, it would be good if we had a way to negotiate SMB2/3
> for the RPC client use case, without the other impacts of raising the
> global 'client max protocol'. 

I'll ping Steve to see if he's ready to start
the SMB2 UNIX standardization work !

Steve - ping ! Ready to go ?