Increasing response times for byte range unlock requests.

[Jeremy Allison]

On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 12:47:34PM +0530, Hemanth Thummala wrote:
> Jeremy,
> 
> Yes you are correct. In that case, I think we can just use
> brl_lock_cancel() instead of remove_pending_lock() to avoid any chances of
> removing existing locks.
> 
> I have also filed bug(https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10673) for
> the same issue. Will look for more updates as part of this.
> 
> Thanks alot for looking at this issue.

No problem, thanks a lot for pointing out
the fix :-). In my examinations I found
a different bug with the SMB1 implementation
of the calls.

So I'll post a patch to master for review
shortly (probably tomorrow, a boatload of
Google stuff to do today) and once that's
accepted I'll back port for 4.1.x and 4.0.x
and then follow up with patch+test for the
SMB1 issue (probably on a different bug
report :-).

Cheers,

	Jeremy.