CTDB waf build
mat at matws.net
Fri Jun 20 16:47:58 MDT 2014
I'm wondering do we still have disagreement on whether going to waf was
a good thing ?
On 06/18/2014 11:19 AM, ronnie sahlberg wrote:
> It will still be possible to build without waf, right?
> I am planning to use ctdb for a different project in the medium term
> future and would like to avoid having to touch waf.
> On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 11:12 AM, Amitay Isaacs <amitay at gmail.com> wrote:
>> Here's the first draft of the migration from autoconf to waf build for CTDB.
>> Currently, CTDB is configured and built separately from Samba (top-level
>> build). The integration of build requires some more work on lib/util, so
>> it can be used in CTDB without bringing in too many samba dependencies.
>> Since these changes drop duplicate libraries (talloc/tevent/tdb/replace), I
>> am not posting the patches on the mailing list. The patches are available
>> in ctdb-build branch of my samba tree.
>> Comments/suggestions welcome!
More information about the samba-technical