CTDB waf build
Matthieu Patou
mat at matws.net
Fri Jun 20 16:47:58 MDT 2014
I'm wondering do we still have disagreement on whether going to waf was
a good thing ?
Matthieu.
On 06/18/2014 11:19 AM, ronnie sahlberg wrote:
> It will still be possible to build without waf, right?
>
> I am planning to use ctdb for a different project in the medium term
> future and would like to avoid having to touch waf.
>
>
>
> On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 11:12 AM, Amitay Isaacs <amitay at gmail.com> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Here's the first draft of the migration from autoconf to waf build for CTDB.
>>
>> Currently, CTDB is configured and built separately from Samba (top-level
>> build). The integration of build requires some more work on lib/util, so
>> it can be used in CTDB without bringing in too many samba dependencies.
>>
>> Since these changes drop duplicate libraries (talloc/tevent/tdb/replace), I
>> am not posting the patches on the mailing list. The patches are available
>> in ctdb-build branch of my samba tree.
>>
>>
>> http://git.samba.org/?p=amitay/samba.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/ctdb-build
>>
>> Comments/suggestions welcome!
>>
>> Amitay.
More information about the samba-technical
mailing list