[RFC 00/32] making inode time stamps y2038 ready

Joseph S. Myers joseph at codesourcery.com
Mon Jun 2 07:52:19 MDT 2014

On Fri, 30 May 2014, Arnd Bergmann wrote:

> a) is this the right approach in general? The previous discussion
>    pointed this way, but there may be other opinions.

The syscall changes seem like the sort of thing I'd expect, although 
patches adding new syscalls or otherwise affecting the kernel/userspace 
interface (as opposed to those relating to an individual filesystem) 
should go to linux-api as well as other relevant lists.

Joseph S. Myers
joseph at codesourcery.com

More information about the samba-technical mailing list