[PATCH] samba: Retain case sensitivity of cifs client

[Jeremy Allison]

On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 04:19:51PM -0700, Jeremy Allison wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 26, 2014 at 10:41:25AM -0500, shirishpargaonkar at gmail.com wrote:
> > From: Shirish Pargaonkar <spargaonkar at suse.com>
> > 
> > When a client supports extended security but server does not,
> > and that client, in Flags2 field of smb header indicates that
> > 
> > - it supports extended security negotiation
> > - it does not support security signatures
> > - it does not require security signatures
> > 
> > Samba server treats a client as a Vista client.
> > 
> > That turns off case sensitivity and that is a problem for cifs vfs client.
> > 
> > So include remote cifs client along with remote samba client
> > to not do so otherwise.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Shirish Pargaonkar <spargaonkar at suse.com>
> > ---
> >  source3/smbd/negprot.c | 3 ++-
> >  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/source3/smbd/negprot.c b/source3/smbd/negprot.c
> > index 4cd12d8..225fe39 100644
> > --- a/source3/smbd/negprot.c
> > +++ b/source3/smbd/negprot.c
> > @@ -262,7 +262,8 @@ static void reply_nt1(struct smb_request *req, uint16 choice)
> >  	if ( (req->flags2 & FLAGS2_EXTENDED_SECURITY) &&
> >  		((req->flags2 & FLAGS2_SMB_SECURITY_SIGNATURES_REQUIRED) == 0) )
> >  	{
> > -		if (get_remote_arch() != RA_SAMBA) {
> > +		if ((get_remote_arch() != RA_SAMBA) &&
> > +				(get_remote_arch() != RA_CIFSFS)) {
> >  			set_remote_arch( RA_VISTA );
> >  		}
> >  	}
> > -- 
> > 1.8.3.2
> 
> Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra at samba.org>
> 
> Can I get a second Team reviewer please then
> I'll push ?
> 
> Shirish, do we have a bug report for this as
> I think we need this in 4.1.x and 4.0.x as
> well.

Ping - we now have the bug report. Can I get
a second Team reviewer for this (Hi there
David, it looks like a SuSE issue to me :-).
Pretty trivial fix IMHO.

Cheers,

	Jeremy.