change the default for "winbind expand groups" to "0"

[Michael Adam]

On 2014-07-24 at 14:26 -0700, Jeremy Allison wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 10:24:43PM +0100, Rowland Penny wrote:
> > On 24/07/14 21:49, Jeremy Allison wrote:
> > >On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 01:34:17PM +0200, Michael Adam wrote:
> > >>On 2014-07-24 at 09:30 +0200, Stefan (metze) Metzmacher wrote:
> > >>>Hi,
> > >>>
> > >>>here's a patch to make winbindd more reliable in environments
> > >>>with large and/or trusted domains.
> > >>>
> > >>>I'd like to see this included in 4.2.
> > >>>
> > >>>I'm sure there're a few open bug reports related to this,
> > >>>but I don't have a reference currently.
> > >>>
> > >>>I can't number of times I've debugged environments which
> > >>>require this...
> > >>Since this was triggered by a case I helped debugging two
> > >>days ago, and we discussed that before, consider this patch
> > >>"Reviewed-by: /me", as soon as you do s/cosmetically/cosmetical/
> > >>in the commit message. :-)
> > >"cosmetical" is not a word :-). Needs to be simply "cosmetic".
> > 
> > I hope you don't mind me butting in here Jeremy, but
> > 
> > oh yes it is ;-) ;-)
> > 
> > See: http://www.collinsdictionary.com/dictionary/english/cosmetical
> > 
> > Rowland
> 
> Touché. I stand well corrected :-).

Thanks for those comments on language!
And while apparently "cosmetical" does exist,
the common word I meant was "cosmetic." :-)

Thanks! - Michael


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-technical/attachments/20140724/d4c310a2/attachment.pgp>