[PATCH][WIP] Make exploiting talloc harder by using a random talloc_magic

[Stefan (metze) Metzmacher]

Am 17.10.2013 23:36, schrieb Andrew Bartlett:
> On Thu, 2013-10-17 at 15:05 -0400, Simo wrote:
> 
>> In that case everything will break immediately anyway, having 2 copies
>> of talloc in the same process is just wrong, so I do not see a *real*
>> problem. It make no sense to cater for broken binaries.
> 
> We are in violent agreement. 

Should we continue to bring a version of this patch upstream?

metze