registry config not being updated on one of my clusters ... how do I troubleshoot this
obnox at samba.org
Tue Dec 9 13:44:18 MST 2014
On 2014-12-09 at 12:35 -0800, Richard Sharpe wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 9, 2014 at 11:46 AM, Michael Adam <obnox at samba.org> wrote:
> > Hi Richard,
> > On 2014-12-09 at 11:21 -0800, Richard Sharpe wrote:
> >> I am trying to use registry-based configuration on two CTDB clusters.
> >> On one of then, the OCFS2 cluster everything works as expected. When I
> >> update a parameter on one node I can see it immediately on the other
> >> node by doing a 'net conf list' command.
> >> However, on the other cluster, even though ctdb status shows both
> >> nodes as up, nothing I do with net conf setparm on one node is visible
> >> on the other node.
> >> Where should I look to troubleshoot this?
> > - samba compiled with cluster support?
> > - samba's config with "clustering = yes"
> > - ctdbd socket in samba matching ctdbd's socket?
> > if that all is confirmed, it _should_ work.
> > - ctdb status prints a lot of useful information
> > - (onnode all) ctdb getdbmap shows the db's attached on the
> > current/all nodes.
> > - ctdb cattdb registry.tdb cats the local copy of registry tdb on
> > a node
> When I do ctdb cattdb registry.tdb on both nodes, there is no
> difference, but node 1 shows nothing when I do net conf list.
same version of samba and ctdb on al nodes?
compiled the same? (smbd -b | grep CLUSTER)
same ctdb config (essentially)? (nodes file ...)
ctdb status says all up and healthy?
ctdb getdbmap prints registry on both nodes?
same smb.conf on all nodes? (clustering = yes ...)
You don't happen to be on irc or so?
This kind of troubleshooting is more easily performed
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: not available
More information about the samba-technical