RAFT and CTDB

ronnie sahlberg ronniesahlberg at gmail.com
Thu Dec 4 07:28:21 MST 2014


Seriously.

Richard Sharpe has just invested a lot of his time to try to help you with
OCFS2 and have demonstrated how/what you need to do to get OCFS2 working
with CTDB.
And this is how you reward him?

Your email is very disrespectful.



On Wed, Dec 3, 2014 at 10:42 PM, steve <steve at steve-ss.com> wrote:

> On 03/12/14 23:22, Richard Sharpe wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Dec 3, 2014 at 2:09 PM, steve <steve at steve-ss.com> wrote:
>>
>>> On 03/12/14 22:46, Richard Sharpe wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>  And you can have more than one node up at the same time. Is that what
>>>>> your setup does too?
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Indeed. Both nodes are up at this very instant
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Is it better to have both nodes up at the same time? It doesn't seem to
>>> make
>>> much difference here. Unless we have a big jpg.
>>>
>>
>> The whole point of CTDB is so that more than one node can be up at the
>> same time and the load is shared across those multiple nodes.
>>
>
> You're almost there. A few more digs at the documentation and you'll have
> made it. ctdb provides fail-over. Important for but not HA. As you describe
> it.
>
>
>> Do try to keep up.
>>
> You too.
>


More information about the samba-technical mailing list