RC2 for third_party.
simo at samba.org
Mon Aug 25 09:44:23 MDT 2014
On Mon, 2014-08-25 at 16:09 +0200, Stefan (metze) Metzmacher wrote:
> Hi Simo,
> >> I thought I was pretty clear:
> >> https://lists.samba.org/archive/samba-technical/2014-July/101236.html
> > Sorry metze but asking for an explicit ACK is like putting a veto on
> > something, we have no rules to allow vetos from any team member, so I do
> > not think such requests have any standing when there are enough explicit
> > acks.
> We also don't have any review rules (for master) at all yet. Currently
> it's just best practice.
> But if someone would tell me he wants to review patches, on a topic
> we're currently
> discussing, I'd keep discussing and explicitly ask this person to get
> Retrying a few times before asking others how to deal with this situation.
> I would not declare such a request invalid just because we don't have a
> rule for it...
I do not think a request would ever be "invalid", but I would not
consider it a veto to proceed.
If others chime in and explicitly ack, and the technical points that
were raised are addressed, of course.
More information about the samba-technical