RC2 for third_party.
Stefan (metze) Metzmacher
metze at samba.org
Mon Aug 25 08:09:58 MDT 2014
>> I thought I was pretty clear:
> Sorry metze but asking for an explicit ACK is like putting a veto on
> something, we have no rules to allow vetos from any team member, so I do
> not think such requests have any standing when there are enough explicit
We also don't have any review rules (for master) at all yet. Currently
it's just best practice.
But if someone would tell me he wants to review patches, on a topic
discussing, I'd keep discussing and explicitly ask this person to get
Retrying a few times before asking others how to deal with this situation.
I would not declare such a request invalid just because we don't have a
rule for it...
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 181 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
More information about the samba-technical