RC2 for third_party.

Stefan (metze) Metzmacher metze at samba.org
Mon Aug 18 01:26:03 MDT 2014

Am 08.08.2014 um 21:50 schrieb Andrew Bartlett:
> On Thu, 2014-08-07 at 21:49 -0400, Ira Cooper wrote:
>> I've updated third_party to deal with the issues that were pointed out in
>> the last review.
>> The libraries are still removed at the end, as in previous versions.
>> I look forward to your reviews.
>> http://git.samba.org/?p=ira/wip.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/third_party
> My view is still that we should keep everything in one GIT repo.
> Specifically, while we still refer to wscript files in the expected
> third_party directory, that those belongs in our GIT tree.  
> I'm willing to be convinced that when we only refer to original vendor
> tarballs, using only the original vendor build system, or we have no
> reference at all (users are left to their own devices) that we can evict
> them.  

I'd also prefer to use references to upstream tarballs,
instead of an external git repo.


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 181 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-technical/attachments/20140818/a5d5aa55/attachment.pgp>

More information about the samba-technical mailing list