RC2 for third_party.
abartlet at samba.org
Fri Aug 8 13:50:20 MDT 2014
On Thu, 2014-08-07 at 21:49 -0400, Ira Cooper wrote:
> I've updated third_party to deal with the issues that were pointed out in
> the last review.
> The libraries are still removed at the end, as in previous versions.
> I look forward to your reviews.
My view is still that we should keep everything in one GIT repo.
Specifically, while we still refer to wscript files in the expected
third_party directory, that those belongs in our GIT tree.
I'm willing to be convinced that when we only refer to original vendor
tarballs, using only the original vendor build system, or we have no
reference at all (users are left to their own devices) that we can evict
Otherwise we are still spreading intimately connected Samba code
(wscript files) across two GIT repositories, and this creates just as
many problems as this proposal is meant to solve. (One specific issue
is because we test and prove our commits using autobuild, the unit of
atomic change is the single GIT hash).
Please also remember to get metze's explicit ACK on this.
Andrew Bartlett http://samba.org/~abartlet/
Authentication Developer, Samba Team http://samba.org
Samba Developer, Catalyst IT http://catalyst.net.nz/services/samba
More information about the samba-technical