[PATCH] locks: rename file-private locks to file-description locks
Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)
mtk.manpages at gmail.com
Mon Apr 21 12:43:02 MDT 2014
On 04/21/2014 08:01 PM, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> On 04/21/2014 09:45 AM, Jeff Layton wrote:
>> On Mon, 21 Apr 2014 12:10:04 -0400
>> Rich Felker <dalias at libc.org> wrote:
>>> I'm well aware of that. The problem is that the proposed API is using
>>> the two-letter abbreviation FD, which ALWAYS means file descriptor and
>>> NEVER means file description (in existing usage) to mean file
>>> description. That's what's wrong.
>> Fair enough. Assuming we kept "file-description locks" as a name, what
>> would you propose as new macro names?
> F_OFD_...? F_OPENFILE_...?
> If you said "file description" to me, I'd assume you made a typo. If,
> on the other hand, you said "open file" or "open file description" or,
> ugh, "struct file", I think I'd understand.
"Open file description locks" is a mouthful, but, personally, I could
live with it. "struct file" is not a term that belongs in user-space.
"open file" is too ambiguous, IMO.
Linux man-pages maintainer; http://www.kernel.org/doc/man-pages/
Linux/UNIX System Programming Training: http://man7.org/training/
More information about the samba-technical