[PATCH] Unix datagram socket messaging
Stefan (metze) Metzmacher
metze at samba.org
Tue Apr 22 12:44:26 MDT 2014
Am 22.04.2014 20:40, schrieb Stefan (metze) Metzmacher:
> Am 22.04.2014 19:44, schrieb Jeremy Allison:
>> On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 05:52:12PM +0200, Stefan (metze) Metzmacher wrote:
>>
>> OK - latest patchset with the following changes:
>>
>>> My idea was to pass 'struct tevent_context *ev' to make it clear that
>>> this has to be this specific type.
>>
>> Fixed.
>>
>>> There's a 2nd socket(AF_UNIX, SOCK_DGRAM, 0); in
>>> unix_dgram_send_queue_init()
>>> which needs to set just FD_CLOEXEC.
>>
>> Fixed. I split the prepare_socket function
>> into two, one to set O_NONBLOCK, one to
>> set CLOEXEC to improve code reuse.
>>
>>> One of the tests explicitly passes path==NULL to unix_msg_init()
>>> and then unix_dgram_init().
>>>
>>> Maybe the better fix would be only call
>>> ctx->created_pid = getpid(); when we call bind()
>>> and set it to -1 otherwise.
>>>
>>> Then 'if (getpid() == ctx->created_pid) {' would do the correct thing.
>>
>> I restored Volker's path == NULL handling
>> and implemented your requested change.
>>
>> Although I'm not keen on the explicit allowing
>> of path==NULL, after looking at the test I
>> do see the use of it, so fixed it as you
>> recommended.
>>
>> Let me know if this is OK to go in.
>
> I'm getting this:
>
> #> bin/msgtest
> no talloc stackframe at ../source3/param/loadparm.c:4595, leaking memory
> PANIC: No talloc stackframe
> Abgebrochen (Speicherabzug geschrieben)
lp_ctx seems to be unused in messaging_dgm_init()...
metze
More information about the samba-technical
mailing list