The Wrapper Project
simo at samba.org
Wed Nov 20 11:25:12 MST 2013
On Wed, 2013-11-20 at 17:20 +0100, David Disseldorp wrote:
> On Wed, 20 Nov 2013 14:51:13 +0100
> David Disseldorp <ddiss at suse.de> wrote:
> > > The wrappers are not finished yet but if you prefer to have a copy of then in
> > > the Samba tree, I don't see a problem.
> > >
> > > For development, marketing and support for *other* projects it makes more
> > > sense to have each wrapper in a separate git tree.
> > If the projects are going to eventually live in separate repositories
> > (I don't object), I think we should consider using git-submodules to
> > maintain links to the appropriate git URLs and versions within the Samba
> > tree.
> I should clarify that this suggestion was made under the assumption that
> the separate repositories lived on git.samba.org and were subject to the
> same review / check-in constraints as are currently in place.
> Otherwise it doesn't make much sense IMO.
Why not ?
What is so special about this code that we can't use an external
project ? We do that for other code we have in our tree.
More information about the samba-technical