Patchset to make __func__ more visible
obnox at samba.org
Mon Nov 11 06:16:37 MST 2013
On 2013-11-05 at 10:43 +0100, Michael Adam wrote:
> On 2013-11-04 at 10:34 +0100, Volker Lendecke wrote:
> > Ah, and it's standard these days. I'd rather #define
> > __func__ in lib/replace if it's not there. At one point we
> > changed True/False to true/false for similar reasons if I
> > remember correctly.
> And what is more, __FUNCTION__ seems to have been a gcc-specific
> addition, not standardized:
> So we should probably add __func__ to replace and replace use of
> __FUNCTION__ by __func__.
> So for the time being, can we push Volker's fix for the debug
> statement? And possibly also the update to README.coding?
> I think both are valuable additions and don't require fixing
> all places or rewriting the debug system before they can be
> applied. :-)
> So if no-one vetoes, I would push them.
Pushed to autobuild.
Cheers - Michael
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 215 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
More information about the samba-technical