[PATCH] set_sd() once again

Gregor Beck gbeck at sernet.de
Fri Nov 1 02:50:31 MDT 2013

Am Mittwoch, 30. Oktober 2013, 14:40:46 schrieb Volker Lendecke:
> I know it's not required here, but there used to be a
> source3 convention to prefer TALLOC_FREE over talloc_free.
So I ought to get used to use TALLOC_FREE exclusively ;-)

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: set_sd.patch
Type: text/x-patch
Size: 3734 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-technical/attachments/20131101/7469a2cc/attachment-0001.bin>

More information about the samba-technical mailing list