[PATCH v9] vfs_glusterfs: Samba VFS module for glusterfs

[Anand Avati]

On 5/29/13 2:01 PM, Jeremy Allison wrote:
> On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 01:58:08PM -0700, Jeremy Allison wrote:
>> On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 01:54:20PM -0700, Anand Avati wrote:
>>>
>>> 3. In our test case the fd number returned by vfs_gluster for the
>>> initial open file _was_ 0. That dirfd() condition needs a fix, I
>>> think?
>>
>> Yep. That's why I fixed it in master and 4.0.x, it already came up in
>> a breakage of a different vfs module that used the same trick.
>>
>>> I don't know if the master branch has equivalent code elsewhere,
>>> couldn't find it easily..
>>
>> Oh now I understand, that's the broken code I fixed in master :-).
>> It's already been back-ported to 4.0.x.
>>
>> You'll need to back port the dirfd removal fixes from 4.0.x to
>> 3.6.x in order for this to wotk.
>
> The bugzilla entry is #9778 - Samba directory code uses dirfd() without vectoring through a VFS call.
>
> Re-open it and request a back-port of this code to 3.6.x and I'll work on it.
>

Doing that right now.. Is it possible to get a backport of 7e80793 
(check_parent_exists() can change errno. Ensure we preserve it across 
calls.) into the release branches as well? Should I open a new bugzilla 
for that, or is it trivial enough to be done without a bug?

Is there any other comment on the v9 patch against master?

Thanks!
Avati