Anybody using "perfcount" modules?

[Ira Cooper]

On Thu, May 23, 2013 at 11:09 AM, Richard Sharpe <
realrichardsharpe at gmail.com> wrote:

> On Thu, May 23, 2013 at 8:07 AM, Volker Lendecke
> <Volker.Lendecke at sernet.de> wrote:
> > Hi!
> >
> > Right now I am looking at the smb perfcount modules as
> > defined in source3/include/smb_perfcount.h. For my
> > requirements that interface would need some changes. Is it
> > okay to mess with it for master, or does somebody (Isilon
> > still around?) depend on the current interface to be stable?
>
> From my perspective you are welcome to mess with that interface :-)
>
>
I'm not dependent on it.

As with all things performance: I'll be interested.

I may be willing to do a USDT DTrace provider based on it, if it is clean
enough to do.  (And it matches up... etc.)

Thanks,

-Ira