Can we please get the GSS-TSIG error fixed and testcase written for 4.0.5?

[Kai Blin]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 2013-03-28 08:52, Thomas Simmons wrote:

> Please do not forget about the MX record problem also:
> 
> https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9485
> 
> We originally deployed (clasicupgrade) using Samba's internal DNS
> server; it was specifically the lack of functioning CNAME and MX
> records that forced our move to BIND9_DLZ. I can't speak for
> everyone, but MX records are a much higher priority for me. In many
> cases CNAME records can be replaced with A records - it just
> requires more time spent maintaining these records. There is no way
> to work around not having MX records under any circumstances.

Adding the MX record support _should_ be easy, but as I mentioned on
the bug report I can't get the tests to work reliably, and thus I
can't get the code into the tree. There's something funny going on
either in that part of the DNS code or in the database representation
of things, and I didn't have time to track it down.

Cheers,
Kai

- -- 
Kai Blin
Worldforge developer http://www.worldforge.org/
Wine developer http://wiki.winehq.org/KaiBlin
Samba team member http://www.samba.org/samba/team/
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with undefined - http://www.enigmail.net/

iEYEARECAAYFAlFULikACgkQEKXX/bF2FpTvmACeKaWq5LTbys+Mjdrfa+FHv35n
kvQAoJnGgDp/svSBD1C0p37SPutT9SBl
=cYkL
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----