OS X 10.9 Maverick

[Richard Sharpe]

On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 3:38 PM, George K Colley <gcolley at apple.com> wrote:
>> I know, but I imagine things may break at subtle points, e.g. some applications and file formats still
>> use resource forks larger then what fits into an extended attribute (vfs objectt streams_xattr). I'm
>> also looking into compatibility issues on volumes that have been accessed or are accessed in parallel with Netatalk/AFP.
>>
>
>
> If the remote server supports NTFS Name Streams then that should not be an issue, since NTFS Name
> Streams support the same size as a file. If the remote server doesn't support Name Streams then this
> data is stored in the famous and ugly dot underbar file. Which is handle by OS X.

Ahhh. This will probably break at some point with streams_xattr then.

-- 
Regards,
Richard Sharpe
(何以解憂？唯有杜康。--曹操)