How much should we work around buggy Solaris/OpenIndiana/Illumos > 16 groups bugs?

Andrew Bartlett abartlet at samba.org
Fri Jun 7 21:49:23 MDT 2013


I've uploaded to https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7588 the
attached two patches that will help some sites that can't fix their OS,
but need more than 16 groups. 

Given that a number of sites seem to deploy this, and there has been no
reaction on the Illumos side indicating a desire to fix this, should we
just do the qsort() unconditionally on Solaris-based OS's, for the sake
of our users?

I don't propose to detect buggy versions, if we did this I figured to
make it happen on all Solaris builds.

Any thoughts?

Andrew Bartlett
-- 
Andrew Bartlett                                http://samba.org/~abartlet/
Authentication Developer, Samba Team           http://samba.org

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: setgroups.patch
Type: text/x-patch
Size: 1954 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-technical/attachments/20130608/9cc8ce2b/attachment.bin>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: nss_winbind-solaris-16-groups.patch
Type: text/x-patch
Size: 1061 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-technical/attachments/20130608/9cc8ce2b/attachment-0001.bin>


More information about the samba-technical mailing list