Internal DNS server. Failure, when a client a) registers an IP b) deletes that IP c) registers again

Michael Wood esiotrot at gmail.com
Sat Jun 1 03:14:55 MDT 2013


On 1 June 2013 10:58, Andrew Bartlett <abartlet at samba.org> wrote:

> On Sat, 2013-06-01 at 10:49 +0200, Michael Wood wrote:
> > On 1 June 2013 10:00, Andrew Bartlett <abartlet at samba.org> wrote:
> >         On Sat, 2013-06-01 at 09:48 +0200, Michael Wood wrote:
> >         > Hi Ricky and Kai
> >         >
> >         > On 1 June 2013 09:39, Kai Blin <kai at samba.org> wrote:
> >
> >  [...]
> >
> >         > I was proposing to get rid of the following (IMO misleading)
> >         options:
> >         >
> >         > allow dns updates = yes
> >         > allow dns updates = true
> >         > allow dns updates = 1
> >         > allow dns updates = on
> >         > allow dns updates = enabled
> >         >
> >         > I was NOT proposing to get rid of the following:
> >         >
> >         > allow dns updates = nonsecure and secure
> >         > allow dns updates = nonsecure
> >         >
> >         > I hope that clarifies my proposal.
> >
> >
> >         Sounds like a very good idea.  I still think this applies:
> >
> >         > > Patches are welcome.
> >
> >         (and I would be very happy to give positive review to such a
> >         patch, if
> >         Kai concurred).
> >
> >         Thanks :-)
> >
> >
> > Here are three trivial patches related to the above.  I hope you don't
> > mind them attached to the e-mail like this.
>
> This is perfectly fine.
>

Thanks, Andrew.  I've just realised I didn't add Signed-off-by to the
patches, so here they are again.

>
> > The first two are documentation patches that I believe make sense for
> > 4.0.  The third one is the one to remove the IMO misleading options
> > for the "allow dns updates" parameter.
>
> These look great, and are inline with what Kai agreed.  We do need to
> finish the job however, so if you could assist with that it would be
> really, really helpful.
>
>
I am afraid I don't have the time for the foreseeable future.

-- 
Michael Wood <esiotrot at gmail.com>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: 0001-WHATSNEW-Fix-4.0-default-for-allow-dns-updates.patch
Type: application/octet-stream
Size: 752 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-technical/attachments/20130601/4abb1d93/attachment.obj>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: 0002-docs-Avoid-mentioning-a-possibly-misleading-option.patch
Type: application/octet-stream
Size: 1117 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-technical/attachments/20130601/4abb1d93/attachment-0001.obj>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: 0003-param_table-Remove-misleading-allow-dns-updates-opti.patch
Type: application/octet-stream
Size: 956 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-technical/attachments/20130601/4abb1d93/attachment-0002.obj>


More information about the samba-technical mailing list