CTDB patches for hardening

[Amitay Isaacs]

On Sun, Jan 20, 2013 at 7:29 AM, Mathieu Parent <math.parent at gmail.com>wrote:

> 2013/1/18 Amitay Isaacs <amitay at gmail.com>:
> >
> > Hi Mathieu,
> Hi,
>
> [...]
> >> Attached are all my patches with signed-off:
> >> 0001-Add-missing-LDFLAGS.patch
> >> 0002-Display-compiler-commands.patch
> >> 0003-allows-to-allows-one-to.patch
> >> 0004-Update-config.guess-2012-12-30-and-config.sub-to-201.patch
> >
> >
> >
> > 0002 is unnecessary since LDFLAGS are printed as part of LIBS output.
> > 0004 should drop updates to lib/replace. I would prefer not to make any
> > changes to lib/replace directly. Make changes upstream (samba) and then
> sync
> > in ctdb tree.
>
> 2 removed,
> 4 (now 3) updated
> >
> >
> >>
> >> Some new platform patches:
> >> 0005-Detailed-platform-specific-FIXME.patch
> >> 0006-FreeBSD-kFreeBSD-Implement-get_process_name-same-as-.patch
> >> 0007-Test-portability.patch
> >> 0008-Don-t-lie-on-unimplemented-gratuitous-arp.patch
> >>
> >
> > These patches look good. May be we can add a simple test that runs test
> > portability as part of the test suite.
>
> Yes. Also, those portability tests can be enhanced.
>
> Regards
> --
> Mathieu
>

Pushed to master.

Amitay.