Samba4 file server status

[Jelmer Vernooij]

On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 09:02:54PM -0300, Juan Pablo Lorier wrote:
> Last year when I was following samba progress it was advised to use
> samba 3 instead of samba 4 if the intention was building a file
> server. As I've not been following the progress since a few months
> now, I don't know if this is still adviced or it has changed.
That's no longer the case. Using Samba 4 should give you the same (or
better) file server as Samba 3.

Cheers,

Jelmer

> El 13/08/13 17:24, Jelmer Vernooij escribió:
> >Hi,
> >
> >On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 05:15:34PM -0300, Juan Pablo Lorier wrote:
> >>I'm setting up a samba file server with samba 3.6 and I'm having trouble
> >>authenticating against an 2003 AD DC and I was wondering what is the
> >>status of the file server status in samba 4 so I can use it instead of
> >>samba 3.
> >What do you mean exactly when you say "the Samba 4 file server"? Are
> >you disabling s3fs and explicitly switching to the ntvfs server?
> >
> >The file server that is used by default in Samba 4.0 is derived
> >from the file server in Samba 3.0. What was originally called the
> >Samba 4 file server is not used by default.
> >
> >Cheers,
> >
> >Jelmer
> 
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-technical/attachments/20130814/2bf74bd4/attachment.pgp>