Samba 4 and winbind
repenny at f2s.com
Mon Apr 15 12:35:03 MDT 2013
On 15/04/13 19:03, Jeremy Allison wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 05:12:36PM +0100, Rowland Penny wrote:
>> OK, do you really want me to log a bug that basically says that
>> because S3 & S4 winbinds are different and the fact that you cannot
>> get the same uidNumber on the server as on the clients that winbind
>> is broken!!
>> You didn't answer the question either, why is winbind built into the
>> samba4 samba daemon.
> It was easier to finish the AD DC code with it internal. I
> would like to see the needed code merged into the source3
> winbindd code and this code replace the built-in version.
> The external code has had more testing in production
> use (IMHO). Having said that I'm not currently writing
> that code, so I don't really have a say over anyone who
> might actually do so.
>> Also, have you ever stopped to think why it is so popular to bitch
>> about winbind? could it actually be because it is RUBBISH!!
> "winbind is RUBBISH" isn't a bug report. I'm only listening
> to bug reports :-).
OK, listen to bug 9795, but in my opinion ( for what it is worth )
winbind is rubbish, god knows how many backends and setting options,
have you looked at sssd lately?
Also they say that the truth hurts.
>> Samba 4 as an AD replacement is a great achievement, it just seems
>> to me that Linux users are an after thought.
> Oh cry me a river :-). Linux users are the complete
> focus of Samba. If you want to hear moaning, run on
> HPUX or AIX :-).
I personally do not use HPUX or AIX, but I am sure any problems users of
either have, are just as valid as mine.
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
More information about the samba-technical