[PATCH] idmap autorid extension to support rid greater than rangesize
ambi at samba.org
Tue Apr 9 13:49:10 MDT 2013
On 04/02/2013 12:38 PM, Abhidnya S Joshi wrote:
> Please find attached patch for multiple range support in autorid idmap
> module. This patch applies to master branch.
> The autorid man page says:
> "SIDs with RIDs larger than rangesize cannot be mapped, are ignored and
> the corresponding map is discarded. Choose this value carefully, as this
> should not be changed after the first ranges for domains have been
> defined, otherwise mappings between domains will get intermixed leading to
> unpredictable results. As the parameter cannot be changed later, please
> plan accordingly for your expected number of users in a domain with safety
Would be good if you would also provide an update for the manpage that
removes the limitation as another patch to keep the docs up2date with
> In production environment, it sometimes becomes difficult to plan max rid
> in advance and thus rangesize. With this patch, autorid module will be
> able to support rids larger than rangesize.(Provided range is available)
> e.g. The existing method is ID = IDMAP UID LOW VALUE + DOMAINRANGENUMBER *
> RANGESIZE + RID
> This patch will use ID = IDMAP UID LOW VALUE + DOMAINRANGENUMBER *
> RANGESIZE + RID – ( MULTIPLIER * RANGESIZE)
This can probably also expressed as
ID = LOW VALUE + (DOMAINRANGENUMBER-MULTIPLIER) * RANGESIZE + RID
Which formula is used for the opposite direction (xid -> SID)?
> where Multiplier is an unsigned integer which defines the number of
> ranges to skip while allocating a range. It is calculated by dividing
> incoming RID with RangeSize.
> Note: This is just extension to autorid and will not hanmper existing
About the patch itself:
+ if (q != NULL)
+ sscanf(q+1, "%"PRIu16, &multiplier);
This hunk doesn't look correct:
1. you should use SCNu16, PRI is used for printf purposes.
2. you should not ignore the return code of sscanf. A return value other
than 1 indicates an error and then multiplier might have an undefined value.
I'll do some functional testing of the patch in the next days, but I am
afraid that one comment that I shared with you earlier is still valid:
There is a potential that this code returns uid/gid values that are
outside of the allowed range.
I'll retest this and let you know about my observations.
More information about the samba-technical