Docu-patch

Volker Lendecke Volker.Lendecke at SerNet.DE
Fri Apr 5 08:45:44 MDT 2013


Hi!

A customer of mine was just bitten by this :-)

Please review & push.

Thanks,

Volker

-- 
SerNet GmbH, Bahnhofsallee 1b, 37081 Göttingen
phone: +49-551-370000-0, fax: +49-551-370000-9
AG Göttingen, HRB 2816, GF: Dr. Johannes Loxen
http://www.sernet.de, mailto:kontakt at sernet.de
-------------- next part --------------
From ced5543ecc63553d31e0c1e87197b0fafeeb59c7 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Volker Lendecke <vl at samba.org>
Date: Fri, 5 Apr 2013 16:44:08 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] doc: Document performance impact of "hide unxx" parameters

Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl at samba.org>
---
 docs-xml/smbdotconf/filename/hideunreadable.xml    |    3 +++
 .../smbdotconf/filename/hideunwriteablefiles.xml   |    3 +++
 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+)

diff --git a/docs-xml/smbdotconf/filename/hideunreadable.xml b/docs-xml/smbdotconf/filename/hideunreadable.xml
index c2c1654..992f135 100644
--- a/docs-xml/smbdotconf/filename/hideunreadable.xml
+++ b/docs-xml/smbdotconf/filename/hideunreadable.xml
@@ -5,6 +5,9 @@
  <description>
 	<para>This parameter prevents clients from seeing the
 		existance of files that cannot be read. Defaults to off.</para>
+	<para>Please note that enabling this can slow down listing large
+	directories significantly. Samba has to evaluate the ACLs of all
+	directory members, which can be a lot of effort.</para>
 </description>
 <value type="default">no</value>
 </samba:parameter>
diff --git a/docs-xml/smbdotconf/filename/hideunwriteablefiles.xml b/docs-xml/smbdotconf/filename/hideunwriteablefiles.xml
index 831e8c6..6665860 100644
--- a/docs-xml/smbdotconf/filename/hideunwriteablefiles.xml
+++ b/docs-xml/smbdotconf/filename/hideunwriteablefiles.xml
@@ -7,6 +7,9 @@
     This parameter prevents clients from seeing the existance of files that cannot be written to. 
     Defaults to off. Note that unwriteable directories are shown as usual.
     </para>
+    <para>Please note that enabling this can slow down listing large
+    directories significantly. Samba has to evaluate the ACLs of all directory
+    members, which can be a lot of effort.</para>
 </description>
 <value type="default">no</value>
 </samba:parameter>
-- 
1.7.9.5



More information about the samba-technical mailing list